Contrast this to the text, which according to Barthes, still bears a logic:

{{{{{++{}"}}}_____________++::::/

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

###34%%%%%%%%%%

/////////////////

///////////////

/////////////////

//////////////////

//////////////////

////////////////

  "The logic regulating the Text is not comprehensive (to define 'what the work means'), but metonymic; the activity of associations, contiguities, cross-references coincides with a liberation of symbolic energy..." (Barthes, 171).  
"a activity associations, (Barthes, but coincides comprehensive contiguities, cross-define energy..." is liberation logic means'), metonymic; not of of references regulating symbolic Text The the the the (to 'what with work 171).

*&^%&#*#%^#^^##^%#$%$@%$^%$

)(*&^&$&^%*&^*^&*%&^^%$&*^%&

%^&%^$^&%&*^^&*%^&%&&%^&*$%^

*^&%^$%#^%$^$%#^%^#^$%^$%

%&^$^%&%*^%^&*^(**) ^%$##%^$#

(*&*&^&*^%*&$(&%(*&^(*&^(*&^&^$

&^%*&^%)^$&^%$&^#*&^$(&

Thus the 'regulated structure' of the text ends up, paradoxically, not really resembling a structure, since it has neither a center nor an endpoint.